Let's see:
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How fast are you?
Collapse
X
-
How fast are you?
36Raw Times63.89%23Pax Times25.00%9I don't care8.33%3what do you mean?2.78%1The poll is expired.
John Kilgore...if winning was easy, losers would do it.
Team9Racing BMW 325i, Old Faithful (with a little evil)Tags: None
-
As a bit of further explanation:
When the autocross day is over and the results have been posted, what do you look at? Do you only pay attention to the other people in the class you ran with? Or do you look to see where you finished in the Raw times? Do you look at the PAX times as well? Which result is most important to you? Do you focus on improving the place you get in RAW times, say you want to place top 10 all year long, or maybe top 5, or do you just want to have FTD at every event? Or maybe you put more emphasis on being the top PAX at every event?John Kilgore...if winning was easy, losers would do it.
Team9Racing BMW 325i, Old Faithful (with a little evil)
Comment
-
I like looking at RAW and PAX, but there is no option for both! Obviously I compare my times to those in my class as well but over the season I could tell I was making improvements to my driving as I started climbing in both RAW and PAX times as the year progressed.- Jerry Ledford
'16 Ram 2500 Big Horn - daily driver / tow vehicle
Comment
-
MOST IMPORTANT
focus on the word MOST, meaning only one. Do you want One dollar or Two dollars, you have to pick only one, you can't have Three dollars.John Kilgore...if winning was easy, losers would do it.
Team9Racing BMW 325i, Old Faithful (with a little evil)
Comment
-
Always comparing raw times. If I can edge closer to the really fast folks it's a great way to see improvements in the car and the loose nut behind the wheel.
Comment
-
I look at both, particularly since there hasn't been a big showing in D Stock so the only comparison I have is outside the class. Pax times are more meaningful to me because I cannot expect to beat EVO's and Z06's (or practically anything else) on raw times. The problem I have with Pax is I'm not sure it is very accurate to apply to every situation...some courses will favor small cars where HP doesn't really matter, and some favor the bigger HP cars, and Pax doesn't account for course layout or track conditions. However, it's all we have at the moment so I tend to use it for my benchmark. I try my best, however, to make the smile on my face the most important result.
Incidentally, if raw time is the most important, shouldn't we be driving shifter-karts or something?Andrew Reynolds
TVR Youth Steward
1994 Mazda Miata Turbo Black SSM #0 (Autox)
1999 Mazda Miata SC Greenish MR #0 (RallyX)
Comment
-
I usually compare myself to the rest of SM, then to CSP to see how bad they beat me.
Like most of SM, I have no where near the car the SM PAX is based on. So, PAX is kind of useless for me.Matt W.
18 SM - Lancer Evolution MR
15 MR - Volkswagen Beetle
Sponsors: Satellite Racing - Defined Performance
Comment
-
This^^^Originally posted by TouringBubble View PostI usually compare myself to the rest of SM, then to CSP to see how bad they beat me.
Like most of SM, I have no where near the car the SM PAX is based on. So, PAX is kind of useless for me.
Yes i'll check a little bubble for you John
Heath Patterson
"Look...both....It's like turbo." - C
Comment
Comment