This is pretty entertaining.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What is PAX?
Collapse
X
-
[QUOTE=tbone;23131]If you look at it that way then the mini driver is the more (talented, faster, better, whatever you want to say) than the other 2. They all 3 ran the same raw times.Originally posted by TouringBubble View PostBut pay no attention to me.....I come from the RAW is REAL mentality.
Drew P.
"Just needed a nut" -John Kilgore
Comment
-
Drew, his argument is that the Mini should be faster in Auto-X. As it was stated, the course would determine that. Minis are wonderful, especially in full prep, but on an open course the V8 would destroy it.
But yeah, based on the raw times I listed and the PAX for each class, the Mini had the best driver.
In an attempt to stifle these arguments, let me just reference the last points event locally for a better example ...
I'm going to reference a few key drivers that best illustrate the point.
#1 - Matt Williams - SM - First in raw time with a 43.446
#2 - Rod Hardiman - STR - Fifth in raw time with a 44.146
#3 - David McFall - XP - Eigth in raw time with a 45.085
Matt Williams ended up fifth in PAX as the SM modifier isn't great - PAX time of 37.754
Rod Hardiman drove his butt off and topped the PAX list with a 36.906 PAX
David McFall was fast, but XP is a PAX killer, so he dropped to 23rd with a 39.990 PAX
Since none of the cars mentioned are really prepped fully for their classes, this is kind of irrelevant in terms of comparison, but it is a real-world example of how the system works.Matt W.
18 SM - Lancer Evolution MR
15 MR - Volkswagen Beetle
Sponsors: Satellite Racing - Defined Performance
Comment
-
Lol ... don't start. I happened to get top raw last event and SM is a good PAX reference.Matt W.
18 SM - Lancer Evolution MR
15 MR - Volkswagen Beetle
Sponsors: Satellite Racing - Defined Performance
Comment
Comment